Legislature OKs Criminal Background Checks for Coaches

May 5th, 2008

School coaches, from the football field to the debate club podium, would be subjected to criminal background checks under a bill passed by the Legislature and headed to Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

The coaches would face the same background checks as classroom teachers throughout Minnesota. All licensed teachers undergo criminal background checks, but only some school districts also require the checks before a coach is hired.

“This is a consistent policy throughout the state,” said Rep. Karla Bigham, DFL-Cottage Grove, the House sponsor of the measure, which passed 112 to 15. It passed the Senate 64 to 0 earlier this week. Approval came on a compromise version of the bill worked out after slightly different versions passed earlier in each house.

As part of the compromise, volunteers such as occasional tutors or parents who might read to a class will not be required to undergo checks.

The measure was prompted by several incidents in which non-faculty members were involved in inappropriate situations. But Bigham said it also grew out of the increased use of unpaid volunteers and non-faculty members to assist in many functions at schools.

Despite the overwhelming vote, opponents suggested the requirement would put an undue burden on some school districts and discourage qualified people from participating.

Pawlenty said Thursday that he supports the measure.

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

By: Mark Brunswick

Employment Screening 101: Don’t Forget the Applicant Release

April 9th, 2008

Since this is a “101″ series, I thought we should discuss one of the most basic requirements of the screening process: the Applicant Release. This should never be taken for granted because it is perhaps the most serious standard set forth in the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).Employment background checks must be authorized in writing by the applicant before a company can proceed (at least when the check is being conducted by a CRA [background screening company]). Failure to get the applicant’s permission before the check is conducted can get an organization in serious hot water.

At a minimum the authorization will inform the applicant that you reserve the right to conduct a background check, define the scope of the search and inform them of who will be conducting the background. In the case of California, Oklahoma and Minnesota applicants the release will include a check box that applicants can check if they want a free copy of their report. {Side note: many organizations that are screening applicants outside of these states forget that even though the other states do not mandate a check box, that the applicant still has a right to request a free copy of the report}. For New York applicants, the release simply advises that they have a right to inspect the report. Those who screen on a nationwide basis, fear not. All of these notifications can be included on one page of an FCRA compliant release form.

Employers should also know that unless your state specifically prohibits it, language can be worked into the release that allows you to re-screen the applicant throughout the tenure of their employment.

Once the release is executed, you can execute the search. Remember to keep the release on file. Accounts of how long vary and you should consult your attorneys about this.

 By: Nick Fishman

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Background Check Provision Passed for Marshall Employees

February 7th, 2008

Employees who apply for jobs at Marshall University or Marshall Community and Technical College must now undergo background checks.

The Board of Governors passed the background check provision, Policy No. HR-14, during its Oct. 16 meeting, marking the first time the university has required background checks campuswide, the policy said.

“We hope, though, that departments have been performing these checks for a while because it’s a sound hiring practice,” Jim Stephens, human resources director, said.

Stephens sent an e-mail to the university faculty listserv Jan. 31 stating the new policy affects all faculty and staff hired on or after Nov. 1, the policy’s effective date.

Current faculty and staff who apply for new positions will be exempt from a background check as well, Stephens said.
Some positions will require more than the basic checks, however.

New employees in upper administrative positions must also undergo a credit history check under the policy, and new full-time healthcare and research employees must also undergo a “healthcare sanctions check.”

The healthcare sanctions check will look for people whom state licensing boards and others have “determined to be fraudulent in their field,” as stated in the policy.

The policy requires background checks to be conducted and completed prior to beginning work, but the president of the employee’s respective institution can grant a deadline waiver to allow employment to begin on time.

However, the background check must still be completed, Stephens said.

Any information found in the background checks, including criminal history, has been deemed confidential and will be released “only in a matter consistent with applicable law,” the policy said.

The Human Resources Web site’s Feb. 1 recruiting bulletin indicates no background check is required for two posted jobs at the Marshall University Research Corporation.

MURC has shown interest in partnering with Marshall and 12 other institutions across the state in implementing the background check program.

However, MURC management must give its approval first due to its officially separate status from the university, Stephens said.

Other exemptions noted in the policy include adjunct faculty, student employees in general and applicants who underwent a university background check within the past 12 months.

Student employees required to undergo background checks include those applying for health and research positions, as well as those who must regularly interact with minors, as stated in the policy.

Nearly every new employee who has undergone a background check under the new policy has passed so far, Stephens said.

Marshall’s Human Resources and hiring departments will control the progress of the background checks in house.

They plan on using third party vendors to aid in conducting the checks, Stephens said.

The policy states new full-time employees will undergo verification of the last 10 years of employment.

There will be verification of all postsecondary education credentials listed on any correspondence.

Those employees will also undergo criminal background checks in all places they have lived in the past 10 years, as well as a sex and violent offender registry check in all locations they have ever lived.

Part-time hires will undergo only the criminal history and sex and violent offender registry checks, according to the policy.

By: Deven Swartz

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Streamlining Background Checks a Must

January 10th, 2008

There are few things more precious than time. For someone to offer their time in the name of charity, it becomes a gift with a lasting impact.

As many volunteers have found out over the years, giving of their free time comes with a hitch that was likely unexpected when they volunteered with all the best of intentions. A police criminal background check has become something of a routine - a safeguard which aims at protecting the most vulnerable in society.

The need for police checks is unquestionable: the process is a relatively unobtrusive means of verifying someone’s good record if they’re going to be dealing with children or other vulnerable people in a position of trust. From hockey coaches and babysitters to volunteers in homes for the aged and counsellors, there is a need and subsequently a demand on police, for a process to have a check system in place.

Over the years, the requirement has become a regular process for people who donate their time to different causes in the city: stop in the police station with a letter of reference, fill out a few forms and wait a week to pick up the completed, authenticated document. But for police, what began as a few checks per week has quickly snowballed into around 3,000 per year, forcing the law enforcement agency to significantly change its approach for 2008: a requirement that volunteers attend the police station on one of four days throughout the year to receive a no-cost, same-day check or pay a $20 fee otherwise.

It may, at first glance, have the appearance of a cost-cutting measure by the department, but taking a step back may help to put the scenario into perspective. For instance, there were now a number of services, many specialized, that are provided by the city police department on a regular basis that weren’t part of the force’s mandate just two decades ago - from handling Freedom of Information requests and conducting RIDE checks to the canine unit and tactical squad, the list goes on.

Consequently, police have to find the most efficient method to administer the most vital programs, which is always done under the watchful eye of a thrifty city council. “We’ve been doing criminal records checks for years, but it’s just been the last five years where it’s really had a huge increase and we had to do something,” said Sgt. Beth Harder, adding the change “isn’t carved in stone” and police are considering extending the expiry date of the criminal checks from three months to six to further accommodate volunteers.

“We’re just trying to find a more efficient way of doing it,” she said.

Last Saturday’s inaugural volunteer day - which was deemed an overwhelming success - was organized in time to cater to those volunteering in upcoming seasons for spring and summer recreational sports such as soccer, indoor hockey and baseball.

(The event was also being used as a springboard to showcase the service, with a number of specialized units setting up displays, tours of the Children’s Safety Village.)

There was a small group of people working in the not-for-profit sector who expressed concerns regarding the change, but the policy could be changed in the coming months to better suit organizations. Police are making a sincere attempt to best accommodate the bulk of background check requests by streamlining the process. And, it’s a time-consuming procedure shouldered by police, and subsequently paid for by the taxpayer.

So it’s in good faith they make an attempt to better serve the public, and in the process make the work more streamlined internally, and we applaud that.

And while they’re not the final answer in vigilance against predatory practices by people who gain and subsequently abuse our trust, these checks are good and necessary, no matter the inconvenience for a Saturday afternoon.

Source: http://www.intelligencer.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=849331

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Texas School District Fingerprinting Kicks off This Year

January 2nd, 2008

About 1 million educators and school staff across the state will get to know their fingerprint a little better this year thanks to a Senate bill enacted in June.The bill requires teachers, support staff and even some volunteers working at Texas public and charter schools to submit their fingerprints for a national criminal history check.

“With this system, we’ll not only know about their past history, we’ll get an immediate notification if any new offenses occur,” said Debbie Ratcliffe, communications director for the Texas Education Agency.

Starting this year and continuing through Sept. 1, 2011, the Texas Education Agency will randomly select districts to be fingerprinted.

Southeast Texas school districts will not know when their turn comes until about three weeks before the fingerprinting equipment arrives, Ratcliffe said. This element of surprise is designed to catch anyone who would try to dodge the background check.

The fingerprinting is nothing new for educators certified since late 2003, but it will affect those certified before that time including support staff such as bus drivers, cafeteria workers and custodians.

The fingerprinting will allow districts to conduct national background checks as opposed to state criminal background checks alone, according to information provided by the Texas Education Agency.

The bill immediately targets anyone with a criminal record that includes homicide, kidnapping, sexual or assault-related offenses, among other crimes. These individuals will be immediately fired or, if applicants, unable to be hired.

Also, a registered sex offender or an offender whose victim was under the age of 18 or a student at the time of the crime cannot be hired or, if already employed, will be fired.

These standards set by the Texas Education Code offer guidance for serious offenses, but the gray area comes when an offense does not fall under crimes listed in the code.

At that point it will go beyond TEA authority, so local officials will make the call, Ratcliffe said.
“I think the hard calls are going to involve the offenses which occurred decades ago,” she said.

Ratcliffe said the process will be monitored closely at Austin Independent School District, the first district to be fingerprinted, in order to work out any kinks in the system before moving on to the other 1200 districts and charter schools in the state.

By: Emily Guevara 

 Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Some Thoughts to Keep Fraud Out of Your Company

December 31st, 2007

No business is immune, including yours. But you can try to see that it doesn’t happen at your company by following these tips from Virginia certified public accountants:

Rotate your personnel. At regular or periodic intervals, perhaps every six months depending upon the nature of the business, switch the people who handle the money, suggested Richmond CPA Andrew Lakoff.

The person could be an accounting clerk, somebody in the back office who normally handles customer payments. She could be switched with someone who handles customer collections or someone from a different department of the company.

The benefits are twofold, Lakoff said: It’s a way of cross- training employees to work in different areas of the company, and it provides a fresh pair of eyes to see what the previous person has been doing.

Just don’t have the same person always doing the same function if you’re fraud-conscious, Lakoff advised.

Say a bookkeeper is employed for 20 years in the same spot with nobody going behind him checking his work. Then he goes out on sick leave and all kinds of irregularities are discovered. He may have been stealing for years.

Break up accounting duties. Do you depend on one person to open mail, process payments, make bank deposits, pay invoices, handle petty cash and reconcile bank statements?

If you have adequate staff, it may be better to divide those responsibilities, the Virginia Society of CPAs said. That way, no one person controls all of your financial activity.

Turn on your software program’s audit trail. Intuit’s QuickBooks and other accounting software has the feature, Lakoff said. It tracks all activity, including when bookkeeping entries are altered or deleted. It provides the user’s name, date and time of changes.

Say an entry for $1,000 was changed to $100. An audit trail will show who made the change and when.

Some software can be set up to automatically send reports to the owners’ computer, a good feature because running a business is immensely time-consuming. Audit trails are useless if no one reviews them.

Have bank statements mailed to your home or a post office box. That way, you get to review them before your bookkeeper does.

Look out for checks written to suppliers or others whom you don’t know, or those made out to a third party but endorsed by someone in your company. Also look for missing checks.

Say a check is made out to “Office Supply Inc.,” said CPA firm owner Sharon Hart of Barcalow & Hart PLLC in Glen Allen. But the signature on the back is that of an employee in your company. That’s who got the money. There’s something kaflooey going on.

Question gaps in check numbers. Are 10 checks missing? Are checks voided? Some people void checks in the accounting system, then falsify them for fraudulent use, Hart said.

Arrange for surprise audits. Bring in a CPA once a year at different times to conduct a surprise audit of your company’s financial records. Knowing one may occur at any time can be a deterrent.

Screen potential hires thoroughly. Check past employment, personal and professional references and criminal records. Ask your trade association or a fellow entrepreneur for the name of a reputable service, or search online using the keywords “criminal background checks [your] county.”

Create a no-tolerance culture. Communicate to every worker what sort of activities constitute fraud and what will happen to those committing it. Consider setting up a third-party hot line for workers to report suspicious activity.

Watch for other red flags. Among them: You ask to see certain reports, but your finance person fumbles around and can’t seem to come up with them. Or, one person does everything from billing to collections to disbursements, but no one is overseeing the activity.

“The owner’s involvement is critical,” Hart said. “It really makes a difference.”

© (C) 2007 Richmond Times-Dispatch. via ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved

 Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Background Checks Can Expose Even the Jolliest Souls

December 13th, 2007

 Who’s been naughty and is likely to end up with a stocking full of coal?It might just be Santa Claus or Kris Kringle.

Public records show that nationally, someone named Santa Claus has been convicted at least a dozen times during the past decade.

Mr. Claus’ indiscretions include a 1996 arrest for driving while intoxicated in Jefferson County, Texas.

And Mr. Kringle has a lengthy criminal record in Oregon.

Even the Christmas crew appears to have had some troubles: Rudolph Reindeer violated a restraining order in 2004.

But don’t plug the chimney and forgo the cookies and milk just yet.

Skilled backgrounders know that you can’t just put someone on the naughty list based on a name. Many people have the same name, but other information would distinguish them – such as their date of birth or home address.

Unless Santa has a summer home in Beaumont, it’s unlikely the Texas drunken driver with the same name is the Santa Claus. None had an address at the actual North Pole, according to public records. But several residents of North Pole, Alaska, have criminal records.

And yes, in Virginia there is a Santa Claus. In fact, there are at least four – two of whom are women. But no public records showed criminal records for those Clauses.

Birth dates also can distinguish individuals in background checks. All of the Clauses and Kringles with criminal records were born in the 1900s. It has been published widely that the Santa Claus was around before that.

While this topic may seem like a frivolous excuse for a writer to combine public records and the holiday season, it’s not all fun and games.

Backgrounding Santa is not unusual. Companies frequently run background checks on the individuals they hire to stand in for the famous North Pole gift-giver, particularly in cases where they interact with children.

Police in some areas of England this year asked organizations that employ “Father Christmas, elves and other festive characters” to run background checks, according to British news reports.

The same techniques I used to check on Mr. Claus can be used to check up on other people in your life.

If your search turns up no records, you’re not necessarily in the clear; the records are incomplete because the agency relies on whatever information the counties provide. According to DPS, for example, Dallas County reported 78 percent of its 2004 criminal conviction records to the state, which is a marked improvement from just a few years ago. Denton County did better by reporting 82 percent of its records.

 Source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-citwatch_12pro.ART.State.Edition1.369feeb.html

 Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Fake Diplomas Are Illegal

December 11th, 2007

Many people wonder what the deal is with ridiculous spam messages such as these:

F A S T T R A C K D E G R E E P R O G R A M Obtain the degree you
deserve, based on your present knowledge and life experience. A prosperous future, money earning power, and the Admiration of all. Degrees from an Established, Prestigious, Leading Institution. Your Degree will show exactly what you really can do. Get the Job, Promotion, Business Opportunity and Social Advancement you Desire! Eliminates classrooms and traveling. Achieve your Bachelors, Masters, MBA, or PhDin the field of your expertise Professional and affordable Call now - your Graduation is a phone call away. Please call: 1-206-888-2083       

This is what’s referred to as “Diploma Mill” spam. If it sounds shady, that’s because it is. In fact it’s 100% illegal to sell fake diplomas, and more importantly it’s a crime to represent yourself as having earned such a degree when applying for work.

The spam operation works like this:

- A sponsor handles the printing and shipping of the fake diplomas.
- Sponsor contacts spammers / mailers in the hopes of drumming up leads
- Spammer sends a message to millions of recipients (who probably, like me, don’t want them)
- Inevitably one or two of them call the number, which is a voicemail prompt which reads as follows (for the number above, anyway - it varies):

Thank you for calling the university degree program. After the tone, please leave your name and two telephone numbers. One where you can be reached during the daytime hours and one for evenings.

Please do speak clearly after the tone. One of the registrars will be in touch with you shortly. Thank you and have a nice day.

From there, the spammer provides your voicemail response to the diploma sponsor. Lately that process has become a bit more labor intensive for the spammer, since (of course) so many people DON’T want to be contacted regarding this so-called “offer.” As a result, several angry recipients of these emails have left voicemails in the hopes of tracking down who is behind them. This leads to issues for the spammer, who previously used to just hand over the voicemails only to be told by a pissed-off diploma sponsor that 4 out of 5 of the calls were angry complaints, or legitimate sounding responses that led to an angry person at the other end of the phone when it came time to reel them in.

So now the spammers have to filter out the complainers from the legitimate people who want to illegally purchase their fake diplomas.

You’ll notice that they word the voicemail in such a way as to indicate that you’re undergoing some University-style admissions process. In reality this is, as one might expect, a purely commercial process. You want the piece of paper. They want your money. No background check takes place. No school transcripts of any sort are required. All you need is a credit card and an address to ship the phony diploma to. And you’re done.

The hazards involved with this flatly illegal practice should be obvious to anyone. Would you trust any new doctor with a diploma on their wall if you were aware that any percentage of real people actively spend their money on these documents? Would you trust a new hire in any field if they presented you with this document as evidence of their expertise? Would you trust a contractor to make any repairs or modifications to your property if they claimed to have a degree or diploma claiming their excellence at what they do?

This kind of fraudulent representation has already happened, and led to some horrifying consequences. In 2003 one Laurence Perry was convicted of manslaughter. He took an 8 year old girl off her insulin and she died. Later, it was discovered that he represented himself with fake medical degrees. That’s an old story, so in all likelihood he’s out of jail by now.

A similar story unfolded as recently as a week ago, when “Doctor” John Curran was convicted of wire fraud and money laundering, after he “treated” 18 year old Taylor Alves in 2002 for terminal ovarian cancer. He basically ruined her life, which was already in jeopardy after such a crushing diagnosis. He’s behind bars for 12 years.

Certainly it’s not only medical degrees or MBA’s which are on offer from these operations.

The sponsors behind these illegal documents treat it as though it’s any other product. One member of bulkerforum.biz (among numerous others) who goes by the name of “Princess” is clearly very experienced in this field. She posted the following back in October of 2007, and apparently generated quite a bit of interest:

Topic: Mailers needed

Hi all.
for those who do not already know
I Sponsor a University program.
I am looking for more mailers to join our mailing group because my program is expanding.
A leads related program.
Pay starts at $18 to $20 depending on volume, for a good lead.

I use a non URL add that works through an email voice mail system, there is a phone number in our adds.
Only USA or Canada leads needed.
A qualified Mailer should be able to generate at least 10-20 good leads per day.
12 leads *$20 = 240$ USD a day
The conversion our good mailers have, is 70% good leads and about 30% bad. They make from $500 to $1500 weekly.
Payments, sent weekly via Bank Wire or WU.

Thanks Dianna

Cute. “Princess” Dianna wants to sell us fake degrees.

She continued to push this promotion several more times right through November 2007.

Note the specificity of what constitutes a “good lead”. No websites, period. This is probably due to the arrest, prosecution and conviction of sponsors such as Craig and Alton Poe, back in December 2004. You can read a brief description of their conviction here. The story itself is quite entertaining not only because it involves lowlife criminal spammers going to jail, but also because of how it came to the attention of the Pennsylvania Deputy Attorney General:

Colby Nolan  is probably the first animal to hold this distinction — an executive MBA from a university.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Jerry Pappert isn’t amused, since Colby is a pet cat and a Texas-based online college allegedly gave the feline a degree for $399.

Pappert’s office used the pet cat to investigate an alleged scheme designed to promote and sell bogus online academic degrees.

The main reason it was so easy to prosecute them and send them to jail is because they gathered their so-called “diploma leads” via easy to identify websites. Diploma sponsors couldn’t ignore this and so they adopted a variety of alternate methods of generating the leads, most notably via throwaway voicemail phone numbers.

None of this makes the practice any more legal, or any more legitimate. If you attempt to use a fake document to gain employment, that’s a crime. in the United States: It’s a federal offence. Several states have begun cracking down on these illicit operations, and more than half of the states in the US have specific laws on the books regarding the sale of these documents, or the use of them as personal documentation.

As with most other types of spam-related crime, this is generally considered a variety of fraud.

In the case of the Poe brothers, they also generated fake grades transcripts, which is a further federal offence.

As with most other products promoted via illegal spammers: you should avoid these at all costs. Princess said it herself: “It’s so simple just too good to be true.”

There is a fantastic blog which tracks illegal diploma mills called (appropriately) diplomamillnews.blogspot.com. Definitely worth a read.

One can only hope that spammers convicted of this type of fraud end up being represented by lawyers with similar “credentials.”

Source: http://ikillspammers.blogspot.com/2007/12/fake-diplomas-are-illegal.html

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Tougher Background Checks Will Make Skies Safer

December 6th, 2007

 Last March, an airline employee in Orlando, Fla., was caught sneaking guns and marijuana onto a plane. The arrest of the man, who was sentenced last month to 15 years in prison, highlights the need for more stringent background checks of licensed airport workers.

While air passengers have become accustomed to going through the security checkpoints put into place after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the logistics of operating an airport make similar requirements for all employees virtually impossible. That is why it is so important that workers go through thorough background screening before being hired to work at airports.

We hope those checks become stricter next month when the Transportation Security Administration takes over the job of investigating the backgrounds of approximately 1.2 million licensed aviation workers. The checks had been handled by the Federal Aviation Administration since 9/11.

The switch comes as the Department of Homeland Security is seeking to crack down on the possibility of an attack being perpetrated by workers who are not required to go through security checkpoints to get on an airplane or enter a sensitive area.

Under the TSA, every licensed aviation worker will be checked against the federal government’s complete terror watch list, which is operated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The FAA only has utilized a partial list in its screening of 21 types of FAA licensees, including flight instructors, air-traffic controllers, dispatchers and flight engineers.

The TSA already conducts background checks on many non-licensed airport employees, such as baggage handlers and store clerks. We think having licensed employees go through the same process will help make security more consistent and tighter.

With the new system, licensed aviation workers will be rechecked every time the Terrorist Screening Center’s database is updated, helping ensure that employees’ information is matched against the latest available data. The FAA currently only checks people when they apply for an aviation worker licenses. Limited resources prevent the agency from conducting ongoing updates.

We agree with TSA officials that the new process will raise the baseline of security at the nation’s airports and help passengers feel a little safer when they head off into the sky.

Source: http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071205/OPINION01/712050301

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Hires and Liars, It’s Truth or Consequences for Job Seekers Who Fib on Their Resume

December 5th, 2007

A resume is a modest document - a dry, page-long summary of achievements that, while failing to capture what writer Richard Price calls “the wonder of me,” makes a serviceable introduction between job seeker and job giver.

And according to many experts, it’s more often than not a steaming pile of bovine feces filled with fraudulent academic credentials, mysterious omissions and wildly embellished job descriptions.

“When some people start dreaming up resumes, they go into an almost novelistic mode,” says Michael Hershman, president of the risk-management firm the Fairfax Group, who cites studies that say fully 70 percent of resumes include a “major misstatement of fact.”

“I think there’s a lot of fraud, personally,” agrees Dorothea Gaulden, a former executive and author of the business ethics tome “Right Makes Might.” “Fraud is everywhere.”

Paul Viollis, the CEO of Risk Control Strategies, a Manhattan security screener for high-end clients, estimates conservatively that six of 10 resumes include “exaggerated or blatantly fraudulent” information. Other experts put the number between 10 and 20 percent.

Some claim resume fraud is on the rise - while others disagree, all concur that people are getting nabbed more often, due to a steep rise in background checks.

And even if claiming a Harvard degree when you actually flunked out of CUNY gets you in the door, misrepresentations can come back to haunt their perpetrators. That’s been demonstrated by a number of recent incidents, which experts say have caused employers to look at resumes more closely.

Former MIT Dean of Admissions Marilee Jones resigned in April after an anonymous source tipped off her egghead associates that she’d fabricated academic degrees when applying for her first job at the university in 1979.

Last year, Radio Shack CEO David Edmondson switched off his career at the electronic retail giant after press reports that he’d fudged information about academic degrees he didn’t receive. Ditto football coach George O’Leary , who was hired and then fired by Notre Dame, for citing phony academic credentials.

The most common misrepresentations are academic degrees, previous salaries and haziness about gaps in employment, says Jason Morris, COO of employeescreenIQ, though he adds that some misrepresentations are honest mistakes or miscommunications.

By: Brian Moore

Source: http://www.employeescreen.com/blog/2007/12/hires-and-liars-employeescreeniq-quoted.html

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company