Pre Employment Screening Articles

How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Roll Tootsie Pop?

When I recently, and perhaps unwisely, signed up to do the Anthem Fight For Air Stair Climb in what may well be the tallest building in Colorado, the Republic Plaza in downtown Denver on February 28th, I was told it will be 1,098 stairs. I find myself asking, how long does it take to climb 1,098 stairs?

Like the rhetorical question of yester year asked us of the wise old owl, I think it is left to the unknown, left to feed the imagination, incalculable because the variances are so great.  If you are a science nerd, maybe you can come close by estimating distance, elevation, temperature, fitness…..Hhmmm.

But how does insanity factor into this? The true question is how stable must a person be to take on a task like this? And does this mental instability play into the time it takes to accomplish it? Hhhmmmm, another head scratcher.

In all seriousness, I chose to do the 56 floor stair climb because it supports a good cause - The American Lung Association. And I am grateful to have the lungs to do it.

At Info Cubic we are committed to community outreach. I feel lucky to be part of an organization that believes in giving back to the community. It is something I was raised with, and have continued to do my whole life. To have the opportunity for my philanthropic behavior to spill over into my work life is also something I am truly grateful for.

So, I’ll lace up my sneakers and hit the stairs. Still in the interim it goes round in my head, how long will this take? An hour? I’ve never done anything like this, 20 minutes?  What will slow me down? What will speed me up? I guess I’ll just continue pondering and wearing down my Tootsie Roll Tootsie pop one lick at a time ……

Stay tuned, the results will be posted in our next newsletter.

Info Cubic had a fantastic time exhibiting at the 2010 Colorado Human Resources Association Conference that was held this year at Mile High Invesco Field. 

It was great seeing some old friends and making many new ones and we look forward to returning in 2011.

Please join us in congratulating Info Cubic’s winner of the iPod Nano, Ms. Lori Palmer from the Arapahoe House - Congratulations Lori!

Interesting news from the wall street journal. I am glad we are here and can help.

U.S. job seekers are crashing into the worst employment market in years and background checks that reach deeper than ever into their pasts.

The result: a surge of people seeking to legally clear their criminal records.

In Michigan, state police estimate they’ll set aside 46% more convictions this year than last. Oregon is on track to set aside 33% more. Florida sealed and expunged nearly 15,000 criminal records in the fiscal year ended June 30, up 43% from the previous year. The courts of Cook County, which includes Chicago and nearby suburbs, received about 7,600 expungement requests in the year’s first three quarters, nearly double the pace from the year before.

Read more…

When Matthew Baken was offered a management internship with a construction company last winter, there was just one caveat: He had to pass a background check. No problem, thought the 26-year-old college student from Rogers.

He had no clue that a former boss would bring up an injury Baken suffered on the job two years earlier — information that is supposed to be private. The former employer told the screening company that Baken suffers from a preexisting back injury that is not work-related. That statement, which is contradicted by documents relating to Baken’s workers’ compensation claim in 2007, cost him the internship.

“I was mad because this is wrong,” Baken said. “I was wondering how it could even be in [the report].”Baken has been worried that the statement would show up in future background checks, possibly ruining his chances of getting a job in his field. He even considered whether it was worthwhile to stay in college.

Jenny O’Brien, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Labor and Industry, said workers’ compensation information is private. State law, she noted, allows individuals to take action against a former employer for purposely providing false and defamatory information and acting “with malicious intent” to harm the employee.“The employee may have a civil recourse against the employer for including that information,” O’Brien said.

Whistleblower contacted Baken’s former employer, Final Choice Builders Inc. of Monticello, which is run by Carrie and Scott Smieja. They declined to comment.

Surprised by background check’s content Baken was at a job site in January 2007 when he felt pain shoot down his leg. “It wasn’t going away and it was getting worse,” he said.A physical examination revealed several damaged discs, and the clinic classified the injury as work-related. It was the first time Baken was diagnosed with back problems. He went back to the job but was told not to lift more than 10 pounds or do other strenuous work that would reignite the problem, his medical records show. Final Choice Builders’ insurance company approved his workers’ compensation claim.

Over the next five months, Baken went to physical therapy every week, but he quit his job in June 2007 to pursue a degree in construction management at North Hennepin Community College. He wanted to avoid the kind of physical labor that caused his back and leg pain.

In February, Baken was thrilled when he was offered an internship with a construction firm. But as the scheduled April start of the internship approached, the would-be employer told Baken there were some concerns about the background check. After getting a copy, Baken was stunned to see that Final Choice Builders had reported that he “claimed an existing back injury was work related.”

“I thought this was on my permanent record,” Baken said. “I didn’t know what to do.”After Baken inquired, the construction company told him the job offer was off the table because the firm didn’t “have time to dig in and get to the bottom” of the situation.

Kevin Spang, CEO of Verified Credentials, Inc., the Lakeville company that ran the background check on Baken, said his company must verify any disputed information under federal law.

“If they cannot provide [documentation] to me, it is immediately extracted from the report, never to be seen again,” Spang said. “At that point, a new report is immediately sent to the employer.” Spang said information for background checks is never reused.

Baken didn’t know he had a right to dispute the background check until he was informed by Whistleblower. He plans to get his information corrected and maybe even reapply at the construction company.

“Life’s a learning experience,” he said. “You have to figure out what is wrong and how to fix it. All I wanted was my chance to get it right.”

By LORA PABST, Star Tribune

Source: http://www.startribune.com/local/54024942.html?page=2&c=y

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

A University employee, working as a computer specialist with access to student Social Security numbers, continued to work in the Registrar’s Office for almost a year despite facing a felony theft by deception charge that in April resulted in a guilty plea yielding a 10-year prison term.

William Ora Mullen accepted a plea deal on April 28, the same day he submitted his letter of resignation to the University.

But, it was not until May 6, nearly a week after the plea and 10 months after he was originally charged, that the University learned the details behind Mullen’s sudden resignation. Mullen informed the Office of Legal Affairs of his guilty plea, and within hours Registrar Rebecca Macon removed his access to University servers and databases, and had all passwords changed.

“When he notified us [of the conviction], we took him out of the office and we were done with him,” Tom Jackson, vice president of Public Affairs, told The Red & Black. “According to Rebecca Macon he used some vacation hours but was not in the office once he reported the violation.”

At that point, the University was in scramble mode. Mullen was given half sick days on May 6 and 8 and full sick days on May 11 and 12. On May 7, Macon accepted Mullen’s vague resignation letter.

In it, Mullen wrote “this decision is unfortunately not of my own choosing and is necessary considering my current situation.”

On May 12, what was to be his final day working at the University, he reported to Habersham County Detention Center to begin serving his sentence.

***

By all accounts, Bill Mullen was a model citizen at his previous job, the Cornelia-based Habersham Metal Products. He was an IT manager responsible for managing the company’s servers, purchasing and strategic planning. But according to Habersham County Superior Court documents, he was accused of using a fictitious online company called Rappaccini-Ga. to obtain payments by “deceitful means” from Habersham Metal starting in August 2005.

According to the court documents obtained by The Red & Black, Mullen sold the company’s products and fraudulent or useless software licensing agreements to Rappaccini-Ga. from Aug. 1, 2005 to March 31, 2008.

“He misappropriated property and misappropriated funds during his employment,” Habersham County District Attorney Brian M. Rickman said in a statement. Court records said the case involved “hundreds of thousands of dollars.”

During a raid of Mullen’s home in July 2008, police seized motor vehicles, guns, computer equipment and even a forklift. Among the vehicles seized were an older model Jaguar, a Pontiac Fiero, a Ford Taurus SHO and a GMC pickup truck.

When Mullen applied to the University in February 2008 to be an IT Professional Specialist, court documents state he was still in the midst of deceiving Habersham Metal. On his University job application, Mullen asked UGA officials not to contact Habersham Metal as a reference.

According to Jackson, “two different people [at Habersham Metal] were contacted and they answered numerous questions and one of the questions we always ask is, ‘is he eligible for rehire’ and they both answered ‘yes.’”

Derek Stapleton, Mullen’s supervisor at Habersham Metal, refused to comment when contacted by The Red & Black and referred all questions to a statement issued by Rickman.

Mullen was hired as IT manager in the Registrar’s Office on March 5, 2008.

“[Mullen] was in charge of the servers and he did have access to everything on those servers, which included [student] Social Security numbers,” Jackson said.

When asked if he was concerned about the possibility Mullen may have copied Social Security numbers, Jackson said there was no immediate evidence indicating any wrongdoing while Mullen was employed by the University.

“The University has run two audits - one by IT and one by internal auditing - looking at what was on the servers, as well as purchases to make sure our inventory was right and the purchases had been done in the proper manner and we found no problems with that,” Jackson said. “All I can say is that we have no reason to believe he accessed them. We have no evidence to believe that he did.”

And for nearly three years, Habersham Metal didn’t either.

***

On July 23, 2008, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and Habersham County Police executed a search warrant of Mullen’s Mount Airy home and the next day placed him under arrest. He was released on bond the following day. The University was unaware of his incarceration, as 2008 documents show Mullen took sick days on July 24, 25 and 28.

Mullen also took a sick day on April 28, the day he pled guilty to felony theft by deception.

An August 2008 evaluation revealed his work performance was affected.

Two weeks following Mullen’s arrest, Associate Registrar Rosemary Segreti made note of his overall performance, which she checked “meets expectations.”

“Bill is a valued employee of the office,” she wrote. “He is responsive to needs of the office. He has good work ethic and gets along with everyone. … if it weren’t for the recent unreliabilty of Bill’s attendance and perceptions by staff of unresponsiveness, this rating would probably be exceeds [expectations].”

Three months later, he was in trouble again, this time with the University. NBC Universal sent a letter to the University’s Enterprise Information Technology Services stating a copyright infringement associated with Mullen’s access to the UGA Network was discovered. Mullen was accused of illegally downloading a movie trailer of “Flash of Genius” from the BitTorrent Web site mininova.org. Mullen apologized, but was found in violation of the University’s Code of Conduct and suspended for three days without pay.

In a letter from Segreti to Mullen informing him of his suspension, she wrote, “[Mullen] has been reminded that as a staff member in a position of trust he is to serve as a pristine example for staff with regards to following the University’s Use of Computers Policy.”

Yet when asked whether Mullen was in a position of trust, Jackson responded: “No, he’s not. Not by our definitions.”

***

On Jan. 1, 2008, the University became the final institution in the University System of Georgia to implement background checks on new employees and to require employees to self-report arrests and convictions.

The policy requires all employees and most non-student employees to report an arrest within 72 hours and a conviction within 24 hours to the OLA. Mullen violated both of those stipulations. The University did a background check on Mullen before he started work in 2008, but the check was done four months before he was charged.

But even after he reported his conviction and impending jail sentence, he was not sent home, according to his personnel file.

On the day he reported the violation, May 6, he was given the afternoon off, but worked May 7.

In an e-mail from Macon to Mullen on May 6, she wrote, “… [E]ffective immediately, you cannot have access to any databases. [Associate Registrar] Rosemary [Segreti] is removing all access at this time and changing all passwords to our servers and databases. There are other duties you be able to perform until your last day on May 12, 2009.”

When asked to comment, Macon referred The Red & Black to Jackson to make all comments regarding Mullen.

In an e-mail dated May 7, Arthur Leed, associate director for Legal Affairs, wrote he would “certainly have no problem with sending [Mullen] home.”

Of Mullen’s 10-year sentence, two years will be served behind bars and the remaining eight years may be served on probation. He cannot contact Habersham Metal, and is ordered to pay restitution - which is yet to be determined.

Mullen wasn’t the first felon found to work at the University.

Cecil Fore III, a former associate professor and graduate coordinator in the Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education, was fired Oct. 24 after the OLA learned he lied on his application. In 1991, Fore was convicted on multiple counts of second-degree sodomy and one count of second-degree sexual abuse against three special education students in junior high schools in Montgomery, Ala., according to court documents. When Fore was hired, UGA did not conduct background checks.

He served time in an Alabama prison from 1991 to 1993. Yet Fore’s curriculum vitae stated he taught special education in Alabama schools from 1979 to 1992.

While a case such as Fore’s would be caught in a background check, cases such as Mullen’s are more difficult to uncover. Jackson said a number of employees have reported arrests, and it would be difficult to find out about arrests outside the Athens-Clarke County area.

“Unless you are going to run a Google-arrest reports over the entire employee database, it would be virtually impossible,” Jackson said. “We have local police records but if it happens in a distant place, we may or may not be aware of it. Clearly he lied to the University about what was going on. Most times we are aware, and most times people do report [arrests]. We have had people report felony arrests and convictions.

“In general, you trust people when you are hiring them, you do the best background check that you can, through previous employers, but someone determined to be dishonest can get around the system at times.”

Source: http://media.www.redandblack.com/media/storage/paper871/news/2009/07/09/News/Uga-Employee.Kept.Working.Despite.Facing.Felony.Theft.Charge-3751016.shtml

 Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

When a Brazilian nanny started moving from house to house, stealing checks from her Westchester, N.Y., and Greenwich employers, and even showing up at a local day care to pick up a child after having been fired, Greenwich police put a stop to her crime spree.

But police said the criminal nanny is a prime example of how residents need to protect themselves when hiring an in-house employee, particularly one in charge of watching children.

“She bounced from job to job, and along the way she committed a crime at each stop,” said Detective Pasquale Iorfino. “When you allow someone into your house, you should know who they are.”

Police arrested the nanny, 27-year-old Fernanda Bender-Puhl, in mid-May after her alleged life of crime finally caught up to her.

Police said Bender-Puhl came here from Brazil on a work permit and aced her interviews at various homes, where she worked as a live-in nanny. Her interviews were so good, most families never bothered to check her references, police said. That is how Bender-Puhl was able to get away with allegedly stealing sensitive financial information from those she worked for. In one instance, police said the nanny cashed forged checks with a value of $16,000.

Police were first tipped off to Bender-Puhl when she showed up at a Greenwich day care in early May attempting to pick up the child of a couple who had let her go eight months before. Iorfino said the teacher called the child’s parents, who live in Westchester, N.Y., who then called police.

“We don’t know what her intentions were,” said Iorfino. “I can only think of two, which is an abduction, or to facilitate intimidation for a possible extortion plot.”

After the daycare incident, police got a warrant for Bender-Puhl’s arrest and, when they looked into her activities further, they realized she was working as a nanny for a Cos Cob family. When they arrived at the home, Iorfino said she immediately admitted that not only had she tried to illegally pick up the child, she also had stolen money from several victims.

Bender-Puhl was charged with breach of peace for the day care incident on May 11. After searching her employer’s residence in Cos Cob, police were able to charge Bender-Puhl with first-degree larceny, eight counts of third-degree forgery and eight counts of fraudulent use of an ATM card on May 20.

She is being held at the York Correctional Institute in Niantic on $25,000 bond. Bender-Puhl’s public defender declined comment on her case.

Iorfino said while criminal behavior in a nanny is not very common, it does happen. As a result, police said it is vitally important for people to thoroughly investigate prospective employees.

Steve Lampert is the founder of an Los Angeles-based Web site Enannysource.com, which conducts background checks for prospective nannies. In seven years of conducting more than 400,000 background checks, Lampert said Bender-Puhl’s story is all too common.

“This whole scenario is far from unheard of, and it’s very preventable,” said Lampert. “The most important part of hiring a nanny is that interview and screening process.”

Lampert said it’s important to have a prospective nanny fill out a thorough form detailing a work history so families can fact-check by calling references and ensuring they are legitimate. Reference checks are even more important than running a criminal history check, Lampert said, because more often than not a nanny will not have a criminal history.

“The number of nannies that have criminal records is really low” said Lampert. “In this particular case, even if they had done a criminal history check, they wouldn’t have found anything, and that would have given the family a false sense of security.”

Iorfino added that if a nanny is dismissed, it is important to make sure the child’s school is aware they are no longer authorized to pick them up.

“You can’t take things at face value,” said Iorfino.

Iorfino said Bender-Puhl is a prime example of how a family can be duped.

“The consistent statement was that Bender-Puhl interviewed extremely well,” he said. “They believed what they were seeing instead of doing a thorough investigation. She knew what to say, how to say it and when to say it, and fooled everyone.”

 By: Debra Friedman

Source: http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/ci_12496985?source=most_emailed

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

No business is immune, including yours. But you can try to see that it doesn’t happen at your company by following these tips from Virginia certified public accountants:

Rotate your personnel. At regular or periodic intervals, perhaps every six months depending upon the nature of the business, switch the people who handle the money, suggested Richmond CPA Andrew Lakoff.

The person could be an accounting clerk, somebody in the back office who normally handles customer payments. She could be switched with someone who handles customer collections or someone from a different department of the company.

The benefits are twofold, Lakoff said: It’s a way of cross- training employees to work in different areas of the company, and it provides a fresh pair of eyes to see what the previous person has been doing.

Just don’t have the same person always doing the same function if you’re fraud-conscious, Lakoff advised.

Say a bookkeeper is employed for 20 years in the same spot with nobody going behind him checking his work. Then he goes out on sick leave and all kinds of irregularities are discovered. He may have been stealing for years.

Break up accounting duties. Do you depend on one person to open mail, process payments, make bank deposits, pay invoices, handle petty cash and reconcile bank statements?

If you have adequate staff, it may be better to divide those responsibilities, the Virginia Society of CPAs said. That way, no one person controls all of your financial activity.

Turn on your software program’s audit trail. Intuit’s QuickBooks and other accounting software has the feature, Lakoff said. It tracks all activity, including when bookkeeping entries are altered or deleted. It provides the user’s name, date and time of changes.

Say an entry for $1,000 was changed to $100. An audit trail will show who made the change and when.

Some software can be set up to automatically send reports to the owners’ computer, a good feature because running a business is immensely time-consuming. Audit trails are useless if no one reviews them.

Have bank statements mailed to your home or a post office box. That way, you get to review them before your bookkeeper does.

Look out for checks written to suppliers or others whom you don’t know, or those made out to a third party but endorsed by someone in your company. Also look for missing checks.

Say a check is made out to “Office Supply Inc.,” said CPA firm owner Sharon Hart of Barcalow & Hart PLLC in Glen Allen. But the signature on the back is that of an employee in your company. That’s who got the money. There’s something kaflooey going on.

Question gaps in check numbers. Are 10 checks missing? Are checks voided? Some people void checks in the accounting system, then falsify them for fraudulent use, Hart said.

Arrange for surprise audits. Bring in a CPA once a year at different times to conduct a surprise audit of your company’s financial records. Knowing one may occur at any time can be a deterrent.

Screen potential hires thoroughly. Check past employment, personal and professional references and criminal records. Ask your trade association or a fellow entrepreneur for the name of a reputable service, or search online using the keywords “criminal background checks [your] county.”

Create a no-tolerance culture. Communicate to every worker what sort of activities constitute fraud and what will happen to those committing it. Consider setting up a third-party hot line for workers to report suspicious activity.

Watch for other red flags. Among them: You ask to see certain reports, but your finance person fumbles around and can’t seem to come up with them. Or, one person does everything from billing to collections to disbursements, but no one is overseeing the activity.

© (C) 2007 Richmond Times-Dispatch. via ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

When employers forego background checks on prospective employees, their lack of foresight can come back to haunt them.

If you are a business owner, manager, or work in the human resources department of a company, you’ve probably hired employees who have been less than truthful on their resumes. In fact, recent studies indicate that 75 percent of all resumes contain some form of falsification and fully 89 percent are misleading. Even though the numbers alone make the case for background checks and resume verification, employers often forgo pre-employment screening of applicants. When they do, the employers’ lack of foresight can come back to haunt them. In some cases, companies have been found liable for negligent hiring and retention. In other cases, employers have faced public relations nightmares. Not too long ago, a prestigious university made the news when it was discovered that their admissions officer had allegedly lied about her educational background, and had not received the degrees she had claimed. In the most tragic cases, workplace violence has claimed innocent lives. Pre-employment screening and background checks prove due diligence, and so can prevent lawsuits claiming negligent hiring. And, by screening out unqualified applicants, employers can save time and money otherwise wasted by recruiting, hiring, and training the wrong applicants. Resume verification and education verification can even help head off wrongful termination lawsuits. Companies that provide employment screening offer a number of services. The type of screening that best serves you often depends upon the industry in which you work. For example, in the healthcare industry, background checks typically include a state criminal report, a social security number report, education verification, employment verification, a professional license check, a medical abuse check, and a sex offender check. Those companies that hire delivery drivers or that employ long-haul truckers most often benefit from a national criminal report, a social security number report, a motor vehicle report and a license verification. Educational institutions and childcare centers usually request a national criminal report, a social security number report, a sex offender check, education verification, and employment verification. Those who work in the accounting or finance departments of companies should undergo a national criminal report, a social security number check, a credit check, education verification, employment verification, and an OFAC terrorist check. Once you make the sensible decision to do pre-employment screening, how do you go about selecting the right company to do background checks? First, look for a well-established company that has a proven track record in both quality and accuracy. Next, make sure that they guarantee confidentiality. Third, check to see that they employ licensed investigators and provide you with the opportunity to speak to a live researcher. Finally, select a company that does both domestic and international searchers, and that does hands-on court research in the United States. In today’s litigious society, and with the prevalence of dissembling on resumes and employment applications, you can’t afford to forego background checks and pre-employment screening of your employees and applicants. It’s a small price to pay for the peace of mind you’ll have knowing that the people you hire are who they claim to be.

By: Tolik

Source: http://www.articlesworld.com/background-checks-and-resume-verifications-protect-employers/

Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

AUSTIN — A background check system used by many Texas schools to spot visitors who are sex offenders is being challenged by two parents who say the process violates their privacy and other rights.

Yvonne and Larry Meadows are suing the Lake Travis school district over a computer system that checks visitors against a sex offender database by scanning their driver’s license. Visitors who don’t consent can be turned away.

The federal lawsuit filed in November is believed to be among the first legal challenges to the policy in Texas. Houston-based Raptor Systems, which performs background checks for Lake Travis and 5,000 other schools nationwide, said it was unaware of similar lawsuits.

The Meadowses say the computerized checks violate their constitutional rights, including freedom to associate with their children at school and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. Neither are listed in the national sex offender database.

Yvonne Meadows said she objected to Bee Cave Elementary School scanning her license because she was concerned about identify theft and a private company collecting her personal information.

“Raptor sold (their system) on this ‘registered sex offenders, we need to be on guard,’ idea but it was primarily a visitor management system,” Meadows told the Austin American-Statesman in its Monday editions.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.

Lisa McBride, the lawyer for the Lake Travis school district, said the district thinks its system is reasonable and fully complies with state and federal law.

Yvonne Meadows said she was refused access to school events unless her license was scanned. She filed a grievance asking the school to instead check her status against the Justice Department’s online sex offender database, according to the lawsuit filed in Travis County.

The district denied the grievance, and Meadows asked the state education commissioner to review the decision. The review is pending.

Other Raptor clients in Texas include the Dallas school district and Southside school district in San Antonio.

The Austin school district has the Raptor system in most campuses, paying the company $182,000 in startup costs and an annual $50,000 service fee.

 Source: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6140215.html

 Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company

Sumner dog owners could face police background checks before they could get a pet license under one proposal heard Monday night by the City Council as it considered the city’s first dangerous dog ordinance.Sumner City Councilman Matt Richardson said some procedure is needed to try and spot dangerous dogs coming into the community, saying the ordinance must have “no loopholes.” At the very least, he said anyone seeking a pet license must state under pain of perjury whether they have been convicted of a dangerous dog violation in the past.

If one dog owner must get a background check then all dog owners would need one.

Councilman Curt Brown wondered if that meant the person with the little wiener dog would need a background check.

Sumner Police Chief John Galle said his concern is that background checks by the State Patrol would simply mean people won’t license their animals. It would also cost $10 and add to the cost of a license.

Richardson said background checks could be triggered by the breed of the dog being licensed because there are certain breeds that are known to be dangerous. He asked Galle to draft a list of known dangerous dogs such as pit bulls and bring the ordinance back to the Council.

The proposed ordinance does not mention dog breeds at all. Like dangerous dog ordinances in many cities, it defines potentially dangerous or dangerous dogs by their actions: acting aggressively, biting a human or another animal. That definition avoids the ire of owners who feel that a dog’s disposition has more to do with its owner and training than breeding.

Mayor Dave Enslow cautioned that adding dog breeds to the ordinance would simply mean the Council chambers would be filled with angry pit bull owners as has happened in other cities.

Council member Cindi Hochstatter suggested a compromise: require a background check to see if a person has been cited for dangerous dog related incident elsewhere only when a complaint has been lodged against the owner’s dog.

Animal control in Sumner and Puyallup is handled under an inter-local agreement between the two cities. Metro Animal Control also handles animal control in Edgewood and Bonney Lake by contract.

Wilson said part of the agreement with Puyallup was to insure both cities have consistent dangerous dog ordinances. The other three cities already do have ordinance regulating potentially dangerous dogs. He said the proposed Sumner ordinance is similar to ordinances in the other three cities as well as Pierce County.

The lack of a dangerous dog ordinance in Sumner has meant the city has had no way to effectively deal with those dogs and their owners. Wilson cited one case last week in Sumner where a person was unable to leave a car because an aggressive pit bull wouldn’t let the person out. He said the city could only cite the owner.

Under the proposed ordinance, that dog might be declared potentially dangerous and its owner required to get a a $250 permit with an annual $50 renewal, he said. The dog also would have to be kept in a proper enclosure and not be allowed off the premises unless securely leashed or muzzled. Owners would also need to have a $50,000 surety bond to keep the dog. Owners could appeal the declaration.

Wilson said a declaration of a dangerous dog ramps up the fees ($500 permit plus and $100 annual renewal) plus a $500,000 surety bond.

Asked if the city would be able to destroy a dangerous dog, Wilson said yes though the ordinance still would allow for an appeal process.

A violation of the ordinance would be a gross misdemeanor punishable by up to a $5,000 fine.

 By: Mike Archbold

Source: http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/495418.html

 Powered by Info Cubic - a pre employment screening company